---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Triple-Bottom-Line Sustainability of Language Models for Edge AI: A Comparison Between SLMs and Quantized LLMs"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00665"
发布日期: "2026-09-01"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 1 Sep 2026 03:44:18 UTC (407 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-09-04T01:35:30+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-09-04T01:32:14+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-09-03T17:35:30.912Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=GPU&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "GPU"
  - "deployment"
  - "latency"
  - "throughput"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 12
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为边缘AI中SLM与量化LLM的可持续性比较，仅提及GPU能耗，未涉及超节点、AI Rack、机柜级系统、互连供电或量产落地等核心内容，与项目关注范围无关。"
AI质检模型: "zj-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-09-04T01:37:01+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 2
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 3
AI技术细节: 2
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "该研究提出综合可持续性评分（HSS），从经济、环境、社会三方面比较原生小语言模型（SLM）与量化大语言模型（LLM）在边缘AI的部署表现。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-04T00:18:00.106Z"
采集批次: "2026年9月3日22点43分34秒"
采集批次ID: "20260903-224334-406"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00665"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Triple-Bottom-Line Sustainability of Language Models for Edge AI: A Comparison Between SLMs and Quantized LLMs

Authors:[Jainil Dharmil Shah](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Shah,+J+D)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.00665) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2609.00665v1)

> Abstract:Edge-AI model selection is commonly driven by one isolated metric - accuracy, latency, memory, energy, or safety, even though a deployable language model must balance all five. Our work focuses on answering the question whether na- tively trained small language models (SLMs) or large language models (LLMs) compressed through post-training quantization offer the more sustainable edge- deployment trade-off. We introduce a reproducible Holistic Sustainability Score (HSS) organized around the triple bottom line: an economic pillar for capability and systems efficiency, an environmental pillar for operational GPU energy and a social pillar for harmful-prompt robustness. Five BF16 SLMs and five LLMs under different quantization approaches - BF16, INT8, NF4 4-bit, GPTQ 4-bit, and GGUF Q4 produce 30 measured configurations. Capability is assessed on five zero-shot benchmarks; efficiency uses latency, throughput, peak VRAM and energy; and safety is approximated by attack success rate on five harmful prompts. Qwen3-30B-A3B/GGUF Q4 ranks first in the combined pool (93.38), followed by Mistral-Small-24B/GGUF Q4 (92.40), while Phi-4-mini/BF16 is the highest- ranked SLM in that pool (89.49). Thus, the hypothesis that native SLMs must be the most sustainable edge choice is not supported universally; optimized quantized LLMs can win overall, while SLMs remain competitive through lower resource demand. Quantization is a systems-level choice rather than a monotonic precision- efficiency trade-off and HSS remains relative to its comparison pool and proxy definitions.

| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2609.00665](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00665) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2609.00665v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00665v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00665](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00665) |

## Submission history

From: Jainil Shah \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/2eb3e28d/2609.00665)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 1 Sep 2026 03:44:18 UTC (407 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2609.00665) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))