---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Improving Information Extraction with Learned Queries"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31058"
发布日期: "2026-08-31"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:35:31 UTC (1,431 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-09-02T03:49:31+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-09-02T03:49:17+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-09-01T19:49:31.717Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Scale-up&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "Scale-up"
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 8
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该arXiv论文实为信息抽取与LLM查询优化研究，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，仅搜索词命中Scale-up但正文无关，判定为无关内容。"
AI质检模型: "zj-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-09-02T03:49:42+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 2
AI来源权威性: 4
AI新颖性: 1
AI技术细节: 1
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "研究者发现，改进信息抽取中的问题设计比扩大模型规模更能提升性能，在四个临床基准和五个大语言模型上仅优化问题设计即平均提升18.6个F1点。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-01T23:06:35.758Z"
采集批次: "2026年9月1日23点56分52秒"
采集批次ID: "20260901-235652-761"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31058"
---

## Computer Science > Computation and Language

## Title:Improving Information Extraction with Learned Queries

Authors:[Omar Sharif](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Sharif,+O), [Soroush Vosoughi](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Vosoughi,+S), [Nikhil Singh](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Singh,+N)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.31058) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.31058v1)

> Abstract:When information extraction fails, a natural instinct is to improve the model doing it: for example, by scaling it up or refining its reasoning. In this paper, we show that another part of the pipeline matters at least as much: the queries used to elicit this information. Across four clinical benchmarks and five LLMs, improving the question design alone raises performance by 18.6 F1-score points, i.e. more than using larger extraction models. To make such question design learnable, we introduce List of Questions (LoQ), which generates document-specific question sets, and FeedQ, a feedback-driven optimization method that iteratively refines questions against extraction outcomes. The resulting optimized questions can be used to train lightweight generators: with fine-tuning, 4B-parameter models match or outperform expert-derived baselines and substantially exceed the performance of much larger untuned models. We release a dataset of 12,820 optimized questions to support a broader shift in information extraction research toward treating question design as a first-class problem.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.31058](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31058) \[cs.CL\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.31058v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31058v1) \[cs.CL\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.31058](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.31058) |

## Submission history

From: Omar Sharif \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/aab80c33/2608.31058)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:35:31 UTC (1,431 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.31058) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))