---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Viable Pool Sizing for On-Chain FX Liquidity: Amplification, Capital, and Resilience"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30957"
发布日期: "2026-08-31"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:24:23 UTC (676 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-09-02T03:49:45+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-09-02T03:49:17+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-09-01T19:49:45.247Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Scale-up&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "Scale-up"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该arXiv论文讨论链上外汇流动性池设计，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，仅命中搜索词Scale-up但实际内容不相关。"
AI质检模型: "zj-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-09-02T03:49:57+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 3
AI新颖性: 1
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 1
AI摘要: "该研究针对机构在链上部署外汇流动性时面临的资金规模与池参数联合设计问题，基于StableSwap机制映射(A, TVL)空间，发现最小可行池规模约为TVL/Q=1000/A；"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-01T23:06:31.913Z"
采集批次: "2026年9月1日23点56分52秒"
采集批次ID: "20260901-235652-761"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30957"
---

## Computer Science > Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

## Title:Viable Pool Sizing for On-Chain FX Liquidity: Amplification, Capital, and Resilience

Authors:[Ryan Fang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Fang,+R), [Ivan Bardziyan](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Bardziyan,+I), [Jessica Wang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Wang,+J), [Mayank Anand](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Anand,+M)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.30957) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.30957v1)

> Abstract:Financial institutions deploying on-chain FX liquidity face a joint design problem: how much capital to commit, and how to configure the pool, to remain both competitive on trading costs and profitable as a liquidity provider? The StableSwap mechanism (Egorov, 2020) interpolates between constant-product (CPMM) and constant-sum (CSMM) market makers (Port and Tiruviluamala, 2022) via an amplification factor A, but neither extreme suits institutional FX: CPMM pools require excessive capital and generate high impermanent loss; CSMM pools are capital-efficient near the peg but drain rapidly under adversarial flow. Using a Merton jump-diffusion price process (Merton, 1976) and the loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) framework (Milionis et al., 2022), we map the joint (A, TVL) space to identify configurations that satisfy all three institutional requirements: competitive slippage, positive return, and shock resilience. Minimum viable pool size scales approximately as TVL/Q = 1000/A; ROC at that minimum is thin (about 0.054% per horizon) and independent of A; low-A pools (A <= 10) suffer slippage exceeding 200 bps under a 10x shock, while high-A pools (A >= 500) suffer reserve drain up to 60%, establishing both a capital floor and a practical amplification ceiling.

| Subjects: | Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.30957](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30957) \[cs.CE\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.30957v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30957v1) \[cs.CE\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30957](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30957) |

## Submission history

From: Mayank Anand \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/e8fc2227/2608.30957)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:24:23 UTC (676 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.30957) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))