---
格式版本: 2
标题: "OCR-MetaReasoning Benchmark: Evaluating the Meta-Reasoning Ability of MLLMs in Text-Rich Image Understanding"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30678"
发布日期: "2026-08-31"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:20:05 UTC (13,055 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-09-02T03:55:05+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-09-02T03:53:56+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-09-01T19:55:05.203Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Meta&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  []
相关厂家:
  - "Meta"
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 20
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文聚焦OCR-MetaReasoning基准与MLLM推理能力，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施、供电散热互连或量产落地完全无关；arXiv来源权威但无相关技术或商业内容。"
AI质检模型: "zj-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-09-02T03:55:08+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 2
AI来源权威性: 10
AI新颖性: 5
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 3
AI摘要: "该论文提出OCR-MetaReasoning基准，用于评估多模态大语言模型在富含文本图像理解中的元推理能力，将演绎、归纳和溯因作为三种推理方向，并分离最终答案正确性与推理过程合规性。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-01T23:06:16.892Z"
采集批次: "2026年9月1日23点56分52秒"
采集批次ID: "20260901-235652-761"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30678"
---

## Computer Science > Computation and Language

## Title:OCR-MetaReasoning Benchmark: Evaluating the Meta-Reasoning Ability of MLLMs in Text-Rich Image Understanding

Authors:[Gengxu Li](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Li,+G), [Yuan Wu](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Wu,+Y), [Yi Chang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Chang,+Y)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.30678) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.30678v1)

> Abstract:Text-rich image understanding requires multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to organize OCR (Optical Character Recognition)-grounded evidence across words, layout, fields, charts, and visual correspondences. Existing evaluations often conflate extraction with reasoning and rarely test whether models follow the required reasoning direction: applying visible rules, abstracting hidden regularities, or recovering missing premises. We introduce OCR-MetaReasoning, a controlled single-image benchmark that treats deduction, induction, and abduction as distinct directions and separates final-answer correctness from reasoning-process compliance. The benchmark contains 1,500 verified samples in a balanced $3\times5$ taxonomy crossing three reasoning types with five OCR-object categories, along with reference reasoning steps, automatic answer scoring, the Meta-Reasoning Macro Score (MRMS), and the Reasoning Process Compliance Score (RPCS). Experiments with representative closed-source and open-source MLLMs show that OCR-grounded meta-reasoning remains far from saturated: models struggle with visible-rule application and layout-sensitive inference, while process-compliant rationales can accompany incorrect final answers under exact-match evaluation. The code is available at [this https URL](https://github.com/gengxuli/OCR-MetaReasoning).

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.30678](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30678) \[cs.CL\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.30678v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30678v1) \[cs.CL\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30678](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30678) |

## Submission history

From: Gengxu Li \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/585cc2b4/2608.30678)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:20:05 UTC (13,055 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.30678) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))