---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Naive Prompt Optimization: Rethinking the Need for Complex Prompt Search"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27266"
发布日期: "2026-08-27"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:47:58 UTC (833 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-30T15:18:41+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-30T15:18:26+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-30T07:18:42.010Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=NPO&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "NPO"
  - "performance"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 28
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "正文主线是面向智能体的提示词优化，提出NPO并与GEPA、GRPO比较，完全不涉及超节点、AI机柜或机架级基础设施。来源为arXiv预印本摘要页，新增事实是单谱系提示优化方法及初步实验结论；固定知识库未见同项历史事实，但未命中不能证明首次。正文仅有摘要，缺少完整实验数据，且无机架级技术细节或商业部署信号；命中“应用与模型效率”强否决项，当前页面不值得纳入业务情报库。"
AI质检模型: "gpt-5.6-sol"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-30T15:18:52+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 10
AI新颖性: 12
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 6
AI评分提示词版本: "v17-精简生产版"
AI评分提示词SHA256: "48fb9777f386026761b4873eaff30807694fb11e9b352d7c69bf2dfde750cc7d"
AI评分知识库版本: "knowledge_base_v1-20260819+runtime.55"
AI评分知识库SHA256: "ca56afec1ff616b1fa4394cd1d08b1e2a6af47eccbe70c802c9f1fea6037e803"
AI评分知识库检索词: "[\"NPO\",\"Intel\",\"PDF\",\"arxiv.org/pdf/2608.27266\",\"HTML\",\"arxiv.org/html/2608.27266v1\",\"v1\",\"RSI\",\"GEPA\",\"GRPO\",\"NPO-optimized\",\"ACM\"]"
AI评分知识库命中: "[{\"id\":\"july-correct-0111\",\"title\":\"StrataCL: Fabric-Native Communication Library for Production Supernodes\",\"sourceType\":\"labeled_article\",\"time\":\"2026-07\",\"matchedTerms\":[\"PDF\",\"HTML\",\"v1\",\"RSI\"],\"rank\":-11.333006229301258},{\"id\":\"runtime-569639751a0dbe7ef3ffccc5\",\"title\":\"[2608.17503] Predict Before Replay: Joint FEC and Flight Control for Reliable Scale-Up Links\",\"sourceType\":\"ai_excellent_article\",\"time\":\"2026-08-18\",\"matchedTerms\":[\"PDF\",\"HTML\",\"v1\",\"RSI\"],\"rank\":-10.52985569710448},{\"id\":\"july-correct-0081\",\"title\":\"AAI 2026: 6th Gen AMD EPYC Server CPUs Power the Agentic Data Center\",\"sourceType\":\"labeled_article\",\"time\":\"2026-07\",\"matchedTerms\":[\"Intel\",\"PDF\",\"HTML\"],\"rank\":-10.511406570061126},{\"id\":\"july-correct-0115\",\"title\":\"锚定 300kW 整机柜演进方向 OAII 社区三项规范联合发布，树立AIDC基础设施建设标准答案\",\"sourceType\":\"labeled_article\",\"time\":\"2026-07\",\"matchedTerms\":[\"NPO\",\"HTML\",\"v1\"],\"rank\":-8.970322730263732},{\"id\":\"july-correct-0010\",\"title\":\"Schneider Electric and AMD release first Helios platform reference design to accelerate AI Factory deployment\",\"sourceType\":\"labeled_article\",\"time\":\"2026-07\",\"matchedTerms\":[\"PDF\",\"v1\",\"RSI\"],\"rank\":-8.011504167715488}]"
AI摘要: "Naive Prompt Optimization（NPO）提出一种轻量级单线提示优化方法，仅用教师模型与 rollout 反馈迭代修订提示，即可在更少 rollout 下达到或超过复杂方法 GEPA 的表现，且教师模型越强优势越明显。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-08-30T18:08:34.867Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月30日14点11分37秒"
采集批次ID: "20260830-141137-130"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27266"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Naive Prompt Optimization: Rethinking the Need for Complex Prompt Search

Authors:[Yuan Chang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Chang,+Y), [Xiaoqi Chen](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Chen,+X)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.27266) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.27266v1)

> Abstract:Efficiently improving autonomous agents across diverse tasks is central to accelerating recursive self-improvement (RSI) in agentic AI, with prompt optimization emerging as a promising approach capable of delivering performance gains comparable to those achieved by fine-tuning model weights, while reducing computational costs in both optimization and serving. However, recent developments increasingly favor unnecessarily complex prompt optimizers. We introduce Naive Prompt Optimization (NPO), a lightweight single-lineage method that iteratively revises prompts using a teacher model with rollout feedback. NPO achieves comparable or better performance than GEPA with fewer rollouts, and its advantage increases with stronger teacher models, suggesting that stronger teacher reasoning can partially substitute for optimizer-side search complexity. In interactive games, NPO remains broadly competitive with GEPA, while GRPO performs better on some tasks less amenable to prompt optimization. We also show that NPO-optimized prompts elicit similar performance improvements when applied verbatim to other student models, especially across models within the same family. Overall, our preliminary results show that simple, linear prompt optimization can rival substantially more sophisticated and complex search procedures.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7; I.2.6 |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.27266](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27266) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.27266v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27266v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27266](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27266) |

## Submission history

From: Xiaoqi Chen \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/06557fa3/2608.27266)\]  
**\[v1\]** Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:47:58 UTC (833 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.27266) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))