---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Question-Guided Evidence Acquisition for Multimodal Visual Question Answering"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19739"
发布日期: "2026-08-20"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:37:45 UTC (9,495 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-21T16:10:11+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-21T16:06:59+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-21T08:10:12.071Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Scale-up&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "Scale-up"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该arXiv文章为多模态视觉问答（Multimodal VQA）技术论文，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，未涉及硬件架构、互连、供电、散热或商业部署，因此评为非优质。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-21T16:11:14+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "论文提出 Q-Guide，一个面向多模态文档视觉问答的小型智能体，根据问题逐步判断缺失证据并调用工具（读文字、缩放、区域定位）补全信息。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T02:12:30.337Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月21日13点55分53秒"
采集批次ID: "20260821-135553-743"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19739"
---

## Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

## Title:Question-Guided Evidence Acquisition for Multimodal Visual Question Answering

Authors:[Alin-Ionut Popa](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Popa,+A)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19739) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.19739v1)

> Abstract:Multimodal LLMs can see a document, but they often can't read it reliably. Small text, tables, visual cues, and topological elements still trip them up under direct visual inference, even when the page is already sitting in the model's context. Most document-VQA systems treat perception as fixed: they encode the page once, ask the question, and answer from whatever the model happened to extract in that single fast pass. We think document VQA needs slower, more deliberate perception: rather than answering from one fixed encoding, the model should spend a bit of extra compute at inference time working out what to look at next, and only then answer. We build this into \\textbf{Q-Guide}, a small agent that reads a question, works out what evidence it is still missing, and calls targeted tool(s) to recover it---reading text where text is needed, zooming in where detail is needed, or grounding a region where position matters. On DocVQA2026 and Manga109, Q-Guide outperforms both direct prompting and recent multi-agent document systems ($65.0\\%$ vs.\\ $40.0\\%$ on DocVQA2026, $32.4\\%$ vs.\\ $24.4\\%$ on Manga109), and the improvement holds across three Claude backbones (Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, and Opus 4.5). We find that accuracy scales with the perception budget---most of the gain appears within two to three deliberate rounds---and that the gain comes from directing perception to the right place, not from complex control logic: adding planners, routers, or multiple collaborating agents does not help.

| Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.19739](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19739) \[cs.CV\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.19739v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19739v1) \[cs.CV\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19739](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19739) |

## Submission history

From: Alin Popa \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/90ccf357/2608.19739)\]  
**\[v1\]** Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:37:45 UTC (9,495 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.19739) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))