---
格式版本: 2
标题: "AI4AI-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents in Algorithmic Design for Recursive Self-Improvement"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20318"
发布日期: "2026-08-20"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:56:59 UTC (1,010 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-21T16:08:18+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-21T16:06:59+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-21T08:08:18.218Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Scale-up&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "Scale-up"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该资料为arXiv论文《AI4AI-Bench》，主题是递归自我改进的算法设计基准测试，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施、供电、散热、互连等完全无关，仅命中搜索词Scale-up但实质不相关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-21T16:09:19+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "论文提出 AI4AI-Bench，用 10 个冻结研究仓库覆盖 10 类训练算法，评估 LLM 代理重写训练算法以实现递归自我改进的能力。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T02:12:49.579Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月21日13点55分53秒"
采集批次ID: "20260821-135553-743"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20318"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:AI4AI-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents in Algorithmic Design for Recursive Self-Improvement

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.20318) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.20318v1)

> Abstract:Recursive self-improvement (RSI) asks whether an AI system can improve the process that produces AI systems, so that the next system inherits the improvement. That process is the training algorithm: a better objective or update rule improves the compute\\mbox{-}capability exchange rate for every subsequent run, including the one that produces the next agent. Whether RSI is feasible therefore turns on whether an agent can design training algorithms. No benchmark isolates that ability: existing suites are won by collecting data or by tuning hyperparameters, and none tells a change to how a run is executed apart from a change to how the model learns. We present AI4AI\\mbox{-}Bench, 10 frozen research repositories spanning 10 training algorithm families. In each task, an agent has 4 hours on one B300 to rewrite the training algorithm; its code is then rerun from scratch for up to 12 hours and scored by a fixed evaluator hidden from the agent, against the repository's original algorithm under the same procedure. Because the 10 metrics are incommensurable, every task is mapped onto one scale on which $0$ is an uninformative model, $0.1$ is the algorithm the repository ships, and $1.0$ is the task optimum. Across 29 configurations of 6 systems on all 10 tasks the mean score is $0.166$, and the best system reaches $0.250$: even the strongest closes under a fifth of the distance between the algorithm that was already there and the optimum. The submissions show where that distance went: most never change how the model learns at all, and the minority that do average $0.226$ against $0.126$ for the rest. More reasoning effort mostly buys the willingness to go there, taking that minority from $8\\%$ of submissions to $64\\%$ and the mean score from $0.094$ to $0.196$. We release the task suite, the evaluators and every scored submission, so that the measurement can be repeated as these systems change.

| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.20318](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20318) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.20318v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20318v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20318](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20318) |

## Submission history

From: Wenyi Li \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/008d1ca7/2608.20318)\]  
**\[v1\]** Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:56:59 UTC (1,010 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.20318) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))