---
格式版本: 2
标题: "A Meta-Study on Replication Papers in Usable Security & Privacy"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20108"
发布日期: "2026-08-20"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:39:31 UTC (2,625 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-21T16:17:24+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-21T16:16:43+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-21T08:17:24.222Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Meta&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  []
相关厂家:
  - "Meta"
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该资料为arXiv上关于可用安全与隐私领域重复性研究的论文，主题为学术研究方法论，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施、高速互连、供电、液冷等完全无关，亦无商业或部署信号，判定为明显无关资料。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-21T16:17:27+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "该元研究采用混合方法考察了可用安全与隐私领域的复制研究现状，共纳入24篇相关论文。核心发现是：严格的精确复制并不存在，约三分之二的研究修改了多处内容，时间与情境变化是最常见的复制动机。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T02:12:30.129Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月21日13点55分53秒"
采集批次ID: "20260821-135553-743"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20108"
---

## Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

## Title:A Meta-Study on Replication Papers in Usable Security & Privacy

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.20108) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.20108v1)

> Abstract:The field of usable security and privacy research is a young and expanding field, which is still developing standards for its research, e.g. regarding replications. We used a mixed-method approach, in order to get a better understanding of the current state of replications in the field of usable security and privacy: (1) we examine the Call for Papers of 13 venues spanning security, privacy, and human-computer interaction; (2) we conduct a systematic search for papers reporting replicated user studies published across these venues between 2016 and 2025, yielding 24 relevant publications; (3) we categorized these 24 papers employing the replication taxonomy proposed by Olszewski et al. (2025); (4) we distributed a survey to the authors of these papers to understand their motivations for conducting replications. Our analysis reveals four key insights: (A) Calls for Papers would benefit from clearer guidelines for authors and reviewers regarding replication work; (B) determining what modifications were made relative to the original study proves difficult when reading replication papers; (C) strict exact replications do not exist in our sample. Approximately two-thirds of the 24 studies altered multiple aspects of the original work; (D) temporal and contextual changes affecting results emerged as one of the most frequently cited motivations for replication. Based on these findings, we offer practical recommendations for venues, researchers, and peer reviewers to strengthen replication practices in usable security and privacy research.

| Subjects: | Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.20108](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20108) \[cs.CR\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.20108v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20108v1) \[cs.CR\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20108](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20108) |

## Submission history

From: Christian Mack \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8e404833/2608.20108)\]  
**\[v1\]** Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:39:31 UTC (2,625 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.20108) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))