---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Limitations of RMS-based Stability Assessment of Converter-based Grids: A Case Study"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18989"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:54:02 UTC (227 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:33:31+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:26:21+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:33:31.743Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=performance&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 10
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为电力系统RMS与EMT稳定性分析，属于电网控制领域，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施、供电散热互连等完全无关，仅命中'performance'搜索词但正文不涉及相关技术或落地。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:36:32+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 5
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "该研究以工业电网为例，指出基于RMS模型的传统特征值分析会误判为稳定，而详细电磁暂态仿真却显示振荡失稳，暴露了RMS法在换流器主导电网稳定性评估中的根本局限。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:17:15.045Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18989"
---

## Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Systems and Control

## Title:Limitations of RMS-based Stability Assessment of Converter-based Grids: A Case Study

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18989) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18989v1)

> Abstract:The increasing penetration of power electronic converters in industrial grids introduces stability challenges at frequencies well above the electromechanical range of traditional power systems. Commercial software tools typically perform eigenvalue-based stability analysis using root-mean-square (RMS) models that assume a quasi-stationary network, thereby neglecting electromagnetic dynamics of assets --- which is standard practice in power system analysis. This paper presents a case study of an industrial grid where the conventional RMS-based eigenvalue analysis predicts stable operation, while a detailed electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation reveals growing oscillations, indicating instability. To bridge this gap, we introduce an alternative modeling approach that formulates the network dynamics in the rotating $dq$ reference frame, retaining the differential equations of electromagnetic dynamics. The resulting model enables eigenvalue analysis that correctly identifies the unstable modes, consistent with the EMT simulation results. Our findings highlight a fundamental limitation of RMS-based stability assessment for converter-dominated grids and demonstrate that dynamic impedance models in the dq frame provide a viable path toward accurate small-signal analysis encompassing high-frequency converter-network interactions.

| Subjects: | Systems and Control (eess.SY) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18989](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18989) \[eess.SY\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18989v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18989v1) \[eess.SY\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18989](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18989) |

## Submission history

From: Pol Jane-Soneira \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/b44cfa80/2608.18989)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:54:02 UTC (227 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18989) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))