---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Tuning the Stochastic Machine: A Systems Engineer's Operating Model for Human-AI Engineering"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19125"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:18:53 UTC (16 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T16:00:52+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:56:53+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T08:00:52.295Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 7
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为LLM运维流程，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，未涉及任何相关技术或商业内容。"
AI质检模型: "tx-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T16:08:14+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 2
AI摘要: "作者提出，专家纠正大型语言模型助手错误后，纠正常随会话消失并反复重现，本质是运维问题而非工具问题；"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:18:22.692Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19125"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Tuning the Stochastic Machine: A Systems Engineer's Operating Model for Human-AI Engineering

Authors:[George Andrikopoulos](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Andrikopoulos,+G)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19125) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.19125v1)

> Abstract:When an expert corrects an LLM assistant's error, the correction usually dies with the session, and the error class returns. I argue this is an operations problem, not a tooling problem: mechanisms for persisting corrections exist and are shipping, but the discipline for governing them -- versioning with provenance, recurrence monitoring, counter-metrics, retirement of stale rules -- does not. Writing as a systems engineer of thirty years, I map the LLM stack onto the machines my profession already operates (frozen silicon, firmware, loadable modules, persistent configuration, volatile memory), identify where the mapping fails (stochastic generation, configuration that binds only probabilistically, no general-purpose retirement (verification) stage by default), and derive from the failures a seven-principle operating discipline with an error loop at its core. Three cases from my own practice illustrate the mechanism, among them a control that silently became the exact harm it was built to prevent. I close with the measurement framework this view implies and the lab study required to test it.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE) |
| ACM classes: | D.2.9 |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.19125](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19125) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.19125v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19125v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19125](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19125) |

## Submission history

From: George Andrikopoulos \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/84b95c44/2608.19125)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:18:53 UTC (16 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.19125) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))