---
格式版本: 2
标题: "CentaurBench: Benchmarking LLM Capabilities on Augmenting vs. Automating Real-World Work Tasks"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18554"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 05:22:20 UTC (6,128 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T16:03:52+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:56:53+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T08:03:52.498Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "内容为LLM基准测试论文，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施、供电散热互连等核心主题完全无关，仅标题含AI一词，无任何项目相关有效信息。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T16:11:02+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "CentaurBench 提出一个统一框架，在 7 个真实工作任务上评估大语言模型是直接自动化任务，还是作为辅助者提升较弱智能体的表现。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:18:18.045Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18554"
---

## Computer Science > Computers and Society

## Title:CentaurBench: Benchmarking LLM Capabilities on Augmenting vs. Automating Real-World Work Tasks

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18554) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18554v1)

> Abstract:Most LLM benchmarks rank models on their ability to automate work tasks. In practice, however, models are often used to assist other (human or LLM) agents. The question that drives model selection is therefore not only which model produces the best output, but which model most improves the work of another (weaker) agent. We introduce a unified framework that evaluates the capability of models to automate and augment another agent's performance. Across seven economically grounded real-world tasks, an assistant model writes assistance text for a standardized lower-capacity worker model, which produces the deliverable. In automation mode, the assistant produces the output directly. Outputs are scored through blind pairwise comparisons by an LLM judge panel with task-specific rubrics, replicated across ten runs. Rankings across the two regimes are only modestly correlated, and the automation winner loses augmentation on five of seven tasks. Assistance is not reliably positive. The unaided worker outranks every assisted condition on three tasks, and only one model's guidance beats no guidance on average. These results suggest that automation ability is an incomplete proxy for assistance quality, motivating benchmarks that evaluate models according to the roles they play in human-AI and multi-agent systems.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); General Economics (econ.GN) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18554](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18554) \[cs.CY\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18554v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18554v1) \[cs.CY\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18554](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18554) |

## Submission history

From: Pattaraphon Kenny Wongchamcharoen \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/c77eabf0/2608.18554)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 05:22:20 UTC (6,128 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18554) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))