---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Self-prompting and cross-model consensus enable reproducible data extraction from scientific literature with large language models"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19025"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:20:11 UTC (3,031 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:32:41+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:26:21+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:32:41.626Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=performance&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "performance"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 10
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为大语言模型从科学文献中提取数据，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施、互连供电液冷等均无关联，明显无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:35:46+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "研究者测试了前沿大语言模型从科研文献中提取情境化数据的四种递进工作流，发现模型在专家提示下表现良好，自行编写提示也接近专家水平，但自主发现文献易出错或产生幻觉，按指南生成数据集仍需人工参与。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:18:24.854Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19025"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Self-prompting and cross-model consensus enable reproducible data extraction from scientific literature with large language models

Authors:[Valentin Romanov](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Romanov,+V), [Monique Bax](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Bax,+M), [Steven Niederer](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Niederer,+S)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19025)

> Abstract:Accurately extracting nuanced, contextualized data from research articles is laborious and time intensive. Here, we investigate the performance of frontier, browser-based large language models (LLMs) to extract highly contextualized information. We demonstrate four escalating workflows, 1) given an expert curated prompt and research articles, most frontier LLMs perform well at data extraction, however can struggle with interpreting scientific context and nuance, 2) given simple instructions, LLMs can author their own prompts which were almost as eNective as expert-written prompts, 3) autonomous discovery of research literature was diNicult, agents either missed or hallucinated references, and 4) LLMs can create new datasets from published guidelines that closely match human-expert judges, but still require a human-in-the-loop. Together, these findings define an auditable division of labour in which experts specify the evidence standard, models cross-check repeated extractions and researchers resolve disputed cases, providing a practical route to scaling scientific data curation without relinquishing expert oversight.

| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Databases (cs.DB) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.19025](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19025) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.19025v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19025v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19025](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19025) |

## Submission history

From: Valentin Romanov \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/d94d2dc9/2608.19025)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:20:11 UTC (3,031 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.19025) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))