---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Model-based bootstrap inference for Cox models after Lasso selection"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18893"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 13:19:55 UTC (460 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T14:41:30+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T14:38:42+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T06:41:30.806Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Oracle&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  - "Oracle"
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该页面为arXiv统计方法论文，讨论Cox模型Lasso选择后的bootstrap推断，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施及核心部件、供电、散热、互连等主题完全无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T14:42:56+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "作者提出一种在Cox-Lasso变量选择后基于模型的自举推断方法，并证明其在稀疏模型假设下具有一阶有效性。模拟显示百分位和学生化区间在中小样本中比自举Wald区间有更好的条件覆盖率，并与去偏区间表现相当；SEER乳腺癌实例验证了可行性。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:18:30.675Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18893"
---

## Statistics > Methodology

## Title:Model-based bootstrap inference for Cox models after Lasso selection

Authors:[Lena Schemet](https://arxiv.org/search/stat?searchtype=author&query=Schemet,+L), [Andreas Groll](https://arxiv.org/search/stat?searchtype=author&query=Groll,+A), [Sarah Friedrich-Welz](https://arxiv.org/search/stat?searchtype=author&query=Friedrich-Welz,+S)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18893) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18893v1)

> Abstract:Inference after variable selection in Cox regression is difficult because simple Wald-type intervals after selection can have poor finite-sample conditional coverage. We study a model-based bootstrap for inference after Cox-Lasso variable selection. The Cox-Lasso is fitted once to the original data to select a set of variables, after which an unpenalized Cox model is fitted using only those variables. Bootstrap samples are generated from a semiparametric plug-in Cox model specified by the coefficient estimate from this unpenalized Cox refit, the Breslow baseline cumulative hazard estimator, and a plug-in censoring distribution. In every bootstrap sample, the selected variable set is kept fixed and only the unpenalized Cox model is refitted. Under oracle-type sparse-model assumptions and standard Cox model regularity conditions, we prove first-order bootstrap validity for this procedure. In the simulation scenarios considered, percentile and studentized bootstrap intervals showed improved conditional coverage relative to the bootstrap-Wald interval in several small- and moderate-sample settings. Their performance was broadly competitive with debiased intervals, although the comparison depended on signal strength, tuning, and selection stability. A SEER breast cancer example illustrates that the procedure can be implemented in a realistic survival analysis and provides interpretable uncertainty quantification for effects reported after variable selection.

| Subjects: | Methodology (stat.ME) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18893](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18893) \[stat.ME\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18893v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18893v1) \[stat.ME\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18893](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18893) |

## Submission history

From: Lena Schemet \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/757d2a8e/2608.18893)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 13:19:55 UTC (460 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18893) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))