---
格式版本: 2
标题: "When Readability and Source Retention Diverge: An Evaluability Gap in AI Translation"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19083"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:32:47 UTC (2,053 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:30:32+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:26:21+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:30:32.829Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=performance&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "performance"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 20
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该arXiv论文研究AI翻译的可读性与源保留，属于人机交互/计算语言学范畴，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:33:32+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 10
AI新颖性: 5
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "研究者通过306人参与的AI翻译实验，发现译文存在“可评估性差距”：可读性高并不等于源文本保留得好。在简单叙述文本中，注重保真度的译文获更高质量评分；"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:18:56.714Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19083"
---

## Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

## Title:When Readability and Source Retention Diverge: An Evaluability Gap in AI Translation

Authors:[Chenchen Mao](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Mao,+C), [Hanjing Shi](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Shi,+H), [Haiyan Jia](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Jia,+H), [Emily Wegrzyn](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Wegrzyn,+E), [Dominic DiFranzo](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=DiFranzo,+D)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19083) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.19083v1)

> Abstract:Readable AI output can leave an evaluability gap: even when the source is shown, an overall-quality judgment may not reflect what an output preserves. We investigated how source-text condition and output rendering relate to perceived translation quality, and how output and system appraisals relate to trust and stated disclosure willingness in a plain-text interface. A focal 2 \* 2 comparison (N=306) using TransLingo examined simple generated narratives and complex literary-philosophical prose alongside LLM-generated readability-oriented outputs and researcher-revised fidelity-oriented outputs. A descriptive stimulus audit indicated greater source retention in fidelity-oriented outputs in both source-text conditions. Factorial analyses showed a significant rendering-by-source-text-condition interaction in perceived quality. Participants rated fidelity-oriented outputs higher than readability-oriented outputs for the simple narratives, whereas no reliable rendering difference emerged for the complex prose. A corresponding source-condition-dependent pattern was observed for perceived intelligence, agency-oriented anthropomorphic attribution, and task-performance trust. A separate theory-ordered appraisal-structure SEM characterized concurrent associations among perceived quality, perceived intelligence, agency-oriented anthropomorphic attribution, task-performance trust, and stated disclosure willingness across six domains, with task-performance trust as the proximal correlate of stated willingness. The observed rating pattern distinguishes source access from source evaluability: for the complex stimuli, displaying the source did not ensure that one overall-quality rating reflected differences in retained content. It also separates support for evaluating translation output from data-handling support for decisions about what personal text to entrust to a system.

| Subjects: | Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.19083](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19083) \[cs.HC\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.19083v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19083v1) \[cs.HC\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19083](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19083) |

## Submission history

From: Hanjing Shi \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/763fc2d1/2608.19083)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:32:47 UTC (2,053 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.19083) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))