---
格式版本: 2
标题: "A Structured Framework for Calibrating Stochastic Car-Following Models: Data Adequacy, Parameter Sensitivity, and Objective Selection"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18944"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:09:38 UTC (420 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:50:34+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:48:16+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:50:34.166Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=model%20fit&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "model fit"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 15
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "内容为arXiv上关于随机跟车模型校准的交通流论文，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施及核心部件完全无关，无技术或商业信号，判定无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:56:32+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 5
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "该论文提出一个随机跟驰模型标定的结构化框架，包含完整性控制的合成设计、修正的方差敏感度分析和最小实现校准协议，并在QIDM与IDM2D两种随机机制下测试。结果显示仅校准噪声参数会使间距误差中位数翻倍，而先拟合确定性参数再叠加噪声校准可恢复；"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:18:58.452Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18944"
---

## Physics > Physics and Society

## Title:A Structured Framework for Calibrating Stochastic Car-Following Models: Data Adequacy, Parameter Sensitivity, and Objective Selection

Authors:[Shirui Zhou](https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Zhou,+S), [Junzhe Ding](https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Ding,+J), [Junfang Tia](https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Tia,+J), [Shiteng Zheng](https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Zheng,+S), [Rui Jiang](https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Jiang,+R), [Anci Shi](https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Shi,+A)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18944) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18944v1)

> Abstract:Calibrating a stochastic car-following model is harder than its deterministic counterpart: the loss itself becomes a random variable, so a favorable random realization can be mistaken for a good parameter vector. This paper develops a structured framework for calibrating stochastic car-following models -- a completeness-controlled synthetic design, a corrected variance-based sensitivity analysis (VBSA), and the minimum-realization (MRMIN) calibration protocol -- across two structurally different stochastic mechanisms, QIDM and IDM2D. We test two claims from deterministic calibration -- that a small number of parameters, and the trajectory itself above all, dominates the sensitivity ranking, and that spacing calibration keeps dominating speed calibration once dynamics are stochastic -- and ask whether a model's noise term can be calibrated on its own. In a balanced synthetic experiment, driving-regime completeness has a mean total-effect index on par with the model's most influential parameter and roughly two orders of magnitude above pair identity, extending rather than reversing the deterministic finding on trajectory-identity dominance. Under MRMIN, calibrating only the noise parameter against a population-wide deterministic fit more than doubles median spacing error across 1644 NGSIM trajectories, but fitting the deterministic parameters per trajectory first and calibrating noise on top recovers it. Spacing calibration remains more cross-dimensionally robust than speed calibration on average, but the deterministic guarantee that this dominance can never reverse is violated in 19-26% of trajectories for both mechanisms. A multi-objective screen in relative-error space then favors joint spacing-speed goodness-of-fit functions over single-dimension spacing calibration. Deterministic calibration guarantees should therefore be re-tested, not assumed, once a model is stochastic.

| Subjects: | Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18944](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18944) \[physics.soc-ph\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18944v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18944v1) \[physics.soc-ph\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18944](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18944) |

## Submission history

From: Shirui Zhou \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8e085e03/2608.18944)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:09:38 UTC (420 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18944) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))