---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Constrained Spatial Pricing of On-Street Parking with Bayesian Demand Calibration"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19015"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:14:21 UTC (473 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:32:57+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:26:21+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:32:57.780Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=performance&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 26
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为城市停车定价的贝叶斯需求校准与优化控制，完全不涉及超节点、AI Rack、GPU、互连、供电、液冷等任何项目关注方向，仅命中无关的performance一词，明显不相关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:36:08+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 8
AI新颖性: 5
AI技术细节: 5
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 8
AI摘要: "研究者利用旧金山SFpark停车数据，通过分层贝叶斯需求模型估算出停车价格弹性为-0.241（95%置信区间[-0.325,-0.176]），并构建带空间耦合、价格变动限制及软性收入约束的非线性定价模型。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:19:10.364Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19015"
---

## Mathematics > Optimization and Control

## Title:Constrained Spatial Pricing of On-Street Parking with Bayesian Demand Calibration

Authors:[Ananya Kale](https://arxiv.org/search/math?searchtype=author&query=Kale,+A), [Mohit Apte](https://arxiv.org/search/math?searchtype=author&query=Apte,+M)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19015) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.19015v1)

> Abstract:Occupancy-targeted curb pricing, including San Francisco's SFpark pilot, often relies on local threshold rules that do not account for spatial substitution or uncertainty in demand response. We estimate parking-price elasticities from disaggregated SFpark data using a hierarchical Bayesian demand model and use the resulting posterior distribution in a spatially coupled constrained pricing model. Partial pooling across districts gives a posterior mean elasticity of -0.241 with a 95% credible interval of \[-0.325, -0.176\]. The pricing problem is formulated as a constrained nonlinear program with spatial coupling, temporal price-change limits, neighbor price gaps, and a soft revenue floor, and is solved with Ipopt. Expected-loss and CVaR objectives are evaluated over joint posterior draws rather than a fixed elasticity. On held-out posterior scenarios, the posterior-based CVaR policy has a lower objective than the SFpark threshold rule and historical tariff with posterior probability 1.00, and than a literature-calibrated robust policy with probability 0.85. Epsilon-constraint frontiers show that posterior calibration changes the efficient pricing set. Results from 60 district-windows across Fillmore, Mission, and Marina also report the associated tradeoffs in occupancy-band performance, revenue, and spatial disparity.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Optimization and Control (math.OC) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.19015](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19015) \[math.OC\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.19015v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19015v1) \[math.OC\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19015](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19015) |

## Submission history

From: Mohit Apte \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/df12555b/2608.19015)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:14:21 UTC (473 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.19015) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))