---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Preference Reasoning under Indeterminacy in Large Language Models"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18631"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 07:27:12 UTC (973 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T16:05:21+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:56:53+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T08:05:21.755Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 10
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该论文研究大语言模型在不确定性下的偏好推理，属于AI理论方向，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级基础设施、供电散热互连及量产落地等主题完全无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T16:11:31+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "该研究提出大型语言模型在偏好推理中的不确定性挑战，将其分为由信息不完整导致的认识论不确定性和由标准社会选择概念下解不存在导致的结构不确定性。实验表明，最新模型系统性地无法区分确定与不确定实例，在校验场景中推理校准不佳。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:19:19.400Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18631"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Preference Reasoning under Indeterminacy in Large Language Models

Authors:[Hadi Hosseini](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Hosseini,+H), [Samarth Khanna](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Khanna,+S), [Xiyuan Wang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Wang,+X)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18631) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18631v1)

> Abstract:As large language models evolve into decision-making agents, the ability to reason over preferences becomes fundamental to alignment, coordination, and collective intelligence. Yet, unlike standard benchmarks, real-world preference reasoning is inherently indeterminate: information may be incomplete, and valid solutions may not exist. We argue that indeterminacy, rather than correctness alone, is a central challenge for AI reasoning. We formalize this challenge along two axes, (i) epistemic indeterminacy, arising from incomplete, partial, or expressive preferences, and (ii) structural indeterminacy, arising from the non-existence of solutions under standard social choice concepts. Across a hierarchy of tasks, we show that state-of-the-art language models systematically fail to distinguish between determined and undetermined instances, exhibiting miscalibrated reasoning even in verification settings.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18631](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18631) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18631v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18631v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18631](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18631) |

## Submission history

From: Samarth Khanna \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/12bda0b2/2608.18631)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 07:27:12 UTC (973 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18631) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))