---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Robust Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: A Wasserstein Counterpart of the Entropic Value-at-Risk"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19073"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:22:48 UTC (95 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T16:01:06+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:56:53+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T08:01:06.611Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 16
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为风险度量与最优传输，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，仅命中cs.AI分类，无任何相关技术、商业或部署信息。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T16:07:54+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 2
AI来源权威性: 8
AI新颖性: 2
AI技术细节: 2
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 2
AI摘要: "本文提出Wasserstein熵风险价值（Wasserstein entropic value-at-risk），用最优传输球替代相对熵球，以覆盖名义模型视为不可能的灾难情景。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:19:19.634Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19073"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Robust Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: A Wasserstein Counterpart of the Entropic Value-at-Risk

Authors:[Deep Kumar Ganguly](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Ganguly,+D+K), [Jan Křetínský](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=K%C5%99et%C3%ADnsk%C3%BD,+J)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19073) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.19073v1)

> Abstract:An agent still learning its environment should be cautious while ignorant and bold once confident. The entropic value-at-risk captures this through a robust-optimization identity---a confidence level fixes the radius of a relative-entropy ball of alternative models---but that ball cannot reach catastrophes the nominal deems impossible, precisely what a safe agent must hedge. We instead use an optimal-transport ball and study the coherent risk measure it induces, the Wasserstein entropic value-at-risk. It has a variational dual mirroring the entropic formula (an inverse temperature becomes a transport price), occupies a definite place in the risk hierarchy, and provably accounts for the reachable catastrophes the entropic measure ignores; we verify both dualities numerically. Driving the transport radius by belief entropy then yields a closed-form robust dynamic-programming operator whose caution contracts as the belief sharpens, with a certified safety sandwich and a sharp safety switch.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.19073](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19073) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.19073v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19073v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19073](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19073) |

## Submission history

From: Deep Ganguly \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/6d141a81/2608.19073)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:22:48 UTC (95 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.19073) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))