---
格式版本: 2
标题: "FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18580"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 06:19:20 UTC (1,504 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T14:55:50+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T14:53:31+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T06:55:50.164Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=SUE&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "SUE"
  - "performance"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文内容为终端任务合成框架FACET，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施、硬件架构或相关互连供电散热等完全无关，仅因搜索词SUE命中，判定为无关内容。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T14:56:15+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "FACET提出一种细粒度智能体式可执行终端任务合成框架，通过重构相关智能体技能并修复执行环境，使指令、参考方案与验证器共享容器状态，从而保留源意图并保证跨构件一致性。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:19:27.983Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18580"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis

Authors:[Kou Shi](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Shi,+K), [Zun Wang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Wang,+Z), [Qisheng Su](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Su,+Q), [Shiting Huang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Huang,+S), [Ziao Zhang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zhang,+Z), [Zhen Fang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Fang,+Z), [Qingnan Ren](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Ren,+Q), [Jin Liu](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Liu,+J), [Yu Zeng](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zeng,+Y), [Yiming Zhao](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zhao,+Y), [Lin Chen](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Chen,+L), [Zehui Chen](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Chen,+Z), [Feng Zhao](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zhao,+F)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18580) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18580v1)

> Abstract:Training terminal agents requires scalable executable supervision, yet synthesizing high-quality terminal tasks remains challenging. Each task couples an instruction, an initialized environment, a reference solution, and an executable verifier; if these artifacts are generated from inconsistent assumptions, the resulting task may be unsolvable or incorrectly evaluated. Meanwhile, multi-stage synthesis can discard the goals, dependencies, state transitions, and procedural constraints encoded in the original sources. We present FACET (Fine-grained Agentic Construction of Executable Tasks), a framework that addresses both information preservation and cross-artifact consistency. FACET reconstructs related agent skills into coherent, information-rich scenarios, then realizes and repairs the execution environment before generating the final task artifacts. The resulting container state serves as shared grounding for the instruction, solution, and verifier, while execution-based validation and targeted repair correct artifact-specific failures without unnecessarily regenerating valid components. FACET produces complex terminal tasks with dense executable checks, and successful trajectories collected from these tasks provide effective, data-efficient supervision. Fine-tuning models across multiple scales consistently improves performance on Terminal-Bench 2.1, while analyses of alternative generation schemes support the importance of environment-grounded construction for task validity and solution-verifier alignment. These results establish source-intent preservation and shared executable-state grounding as key principles for scalable terminal-task synthesis.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Programming Languages (cs.PL) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18580](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18580) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18580v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18580v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18580](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18580) |

## Submission history

From: Zhen Fang \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/746d3e13/2608.18580)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 06:19:20 UTC (1,504 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18580) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))
