---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Epistemic Subordination: Generative AI and the Infrastructure of Knowledge"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18758"
发布日期: "2026-08-19"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:06:12 UTC (278 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T16:02:45+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:56:53+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T08:02:45.258Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 15
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为生成式AI的认识论与法律问题，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级基础设施等完全无关，明显不相关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T16:09:49+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 10
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "Gilad Abiri 和 Emanuel V. Towfigh 提出“认知从属”概念：生成式 AI 将主导文化的认知方式编码为默认知识基础设施，使少数群体认识论在输出中被结构性压制。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:19:56.937Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18758"
---

## Computer Science > Computers and Society

## Title:Epistemic Subordination: Generative AI and the Infrastructure of Knowledge

Authors:[Gilad Abiri](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Abiri,+G), [Emanuel V. Towfigh](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Towfigh,+E+V)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18758)

> Abstract:Generative AI does not merely produce biased outputs. It encodes the majority's way of knowing as the default infrastructure of knowledge itself. We call this epistemic subordination. The training process compresses the full breadth of human expression into a single probabilistic model whose statistical baseline reflects the languages, assumptions, and cultural frameworks of the dominant culture. Minority epistemologies are not excluded but absorbed: present in the training data, yet structurally subordinated in the output. The result is not a collection of discrete biases that can be audited and corrected. It is an epistemic condition embedded in the architecture from which all outputs emerge. This unified harm cuts across three legal domains -- anti-discrimination law, cultural and linguistic rights, and democratic viewpoint pluralism -- and each fails to address it for the same structural reason: existing law regulates downstream, at the level of decisions and applications. The remedy must match the site of harm. If epistemic subordination is produced at the level of model training, then law must learn to govern at that level.

| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18758](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18758) \[cs.CY\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18758v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18758v1) \[cs.CY\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18758](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18758) |

## Submission history

From: Gilad Abiri \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/22fc08a1/2608.18758)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:06:12 UTC (278 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18758) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))