---
格式版本: 2
标题: "How AI Prompts Can Teach Us About the Structure of Human Behavior"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18265"
发布日期: "2026-08-18"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:30:59 UTC (760 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:53:00+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:48:16+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:53:00.546Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=model%20fit&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "model fit"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该资料为arXiv经济学理论论文，研究AI提示与人类行为结构，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施、互连供电液冷等主题完全无关，不涉及任何项目关注范围。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:59:13+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "研究人员提出一种用大型语言模型提示词研究人类行为结构的方法：为模型赋予“类型向量”并让其做出选择，以匹配真实人类决策；"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:20:58.196Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18265"
---

## Economics > Theoretical Economics

## Title:How AI Prompts Can Teach Us About the Structure of Human Behavior

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18265) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18265v1)

> Abstract:We introduce a general, easy-to-implement AI-based method for studying the structure and complexity of human behavior. We assign a large language model a \`\`type vector'' and then prompt it to choose actions across settings in which we observe human choices. For instance, the type vector (2,4) becomes \`\`You are a player characterized by the following profile: 2 out of 5 in Altruism, 4 out of 5 in Risk Aversion,'' after which it is prompted to make choices. We vary the dimensions (e.g., Altruism, Fairness, Trust, $\dots$) and values (e.g., 1--5) to minimize distance to human choices. Applying the method to 119,147 decisions made by 78,657 subjects from more than 35 countries across 10 classic economic game roles, we find that human behavior can be closely matched using three dimensions: Risk Aversion, Strategic Sophistication, and Trust. Moreover, the types needed to fit individuals across games cluster into fewer than a dozen groups, and can predict behavior in held-out games with different rules and available actions. The results suggest that behavior across diverse settings can be approximated by a low-dimensional, portable representation, supporting the possibility of general yet parsimonious theories across the behavioral sciences. More broadly, the method can provide insights into the structure of many human behaviors.

| Subjects: | Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18265](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18265) \[econ.TH\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18265v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18265v1) \[econ.TH\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18265](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18265) |

## Submission history

From: Matthew O. Jackson \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/9bb8ad5c/2608.18265)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:30:59 UTC (760 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18265) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))