---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Engine-Transfer-Bench: An Evidence-Based Benchmark for Document Compilation Engine Selection"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18329"
发布日期: "2026-08-18"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:29:13 UTC (21 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:36:20+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:33:55+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:36:20.612Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=latency&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "latency"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为文档编译引擎基准测试，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施、供电散热及高速互连等核心主题完全无关，仅因搜索词含latency而命中。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:39:18+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "研究者提出 Engine-Transfer-Bench（ETB），基于1784个开放文档，从可靠性、延迟、文本一致性和失败率四个方面评估常见文档编译引擎；"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:22:21.830Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18329"
---

## Computer Science > Software Engineering

## Title:Engine-Transfer-Bench: An Evidence-Based Benchmark for Document Compilation Engine Selection

Authors:[Prajwal S. Venkateshmurthy](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Venkateshmurthy,+P+S)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18329) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.18329v1)

> Abstract:There is no shared framework for selecting among document compilation engines (pdfLaTeX, XeLaTeX, LuaLaTeX, Tectonic, Typst, and pandoc PDF backends). We present Engine-Transfer-Bench (ETB): 1,784 open documents, four tasks covering reliability, latency, text consistency, and failures, a pinned harness, and host-tagged multi-OS results. On GitHub Actions (N=4,211 compiles per host across macOS, Ubuntu, and Windows), Tectonic success is stable within 0.9 percentage points (96.3-97.2%), whereas classic TeX Live-style engines vary by 12-20 percentage points according to distribution policy (Ubuntu apt, MiKTeX auto-install, or macOS BasicTeX). On 702 portable LaTeX documents, the tested engines succeed at 100%, making latency the primary selection factor; failures concentrate in 107 engine-specific templates. Within ETB, failures are architectural, involving fonts, layout, and assets, rather than missing packages on a provisioned host. A 50-pair validation of the S\_pdf text-consistency metric achieves 94% precision for real content divergence. We release ETB, ETB-Porta, a recommender and portability gate, and a public cross-OS harness as shared infrastructure.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Software Engineering (cs.SE); Programming Languages (cs.PL) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.18329](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18329) \[cs.SE\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.18329v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18329v1) \[cs.SE\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18329](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18329) |

## Submission history

From: Prajwal S. Venkateshmurthy \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8f5088c7/2608.18329)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:29:13 UTC (21 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.18329) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))