---
格式版本: 2
标题: "An Omitted Mode Is a Rare Rule: The Sampling-Verification Danger Law in Continuous Code World Models"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17956"
发布日期: "2026-08-18"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 16:09:51 UTC (212 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:53:45+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:48:16+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:53:46.103Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=model%20fit&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "model fit"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 10
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该页面为arXiv机器学习论文，研究代码世界模型中的采样验证问题，与AI Rack、超节点、机柜级AI基础设施等主题完全无关，无相关技术或商业信号。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T16:00:06+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "该研究证明，在连续控制中，LLM合成的Code World Model即使通过采样验证被接受，仍可能遗漏关键模式；在混合仪器上，这种模式盲模型可被规划器利用，遗憾接近全部可得回报。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:21:55.912Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17956"
---

## Computer Science > Machine Learning

## Title:An Omitted Mode Is a Rare Rule: The Sampling-Verification Danger Law in Continuous Code World Models

Authors:[Javier Aguilar Martín](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Mart%C3%ADn,+J+A)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.17956) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.17956v1)

> Abstract:In the Code World Model paradigm an LLM synthesizes an executable world model that a classical planner searches, and the model is accepted when it reproduces sampled transitions. We ask what that acceptance certifies in continuous control. We define the pipeline's danger as an expected risk and isolate its exact factor: the probability that N i.i.d. gate rollouts all miss a critical event of probability r is exactly (1-r)^N; an independent acceptance sample adds its budget to the exponent. On three hybrid instruments the accepted mode-blind model is exploited: the planner is pinned at the mode boundary at a regret of nearly the whole attainable return. We prove a localization budget, valid at boundary points: models with Lipschitz constant at most L differing by eta at a point disagree above tolerance eps on a region of volume at least kappa((eta-eps)/L)^(d+m); the discontinuous reset modes studied pay no such budget. With real LLM synthesis, GPT-5.x repairs an omitted 1D clamp in 105 of 111 mode-containing draws -- every attempt exact on 50 of 56 instrument-stream blocks (95% CI \[0.781, 0.960\]). On 2D regions no artifact recovers the rule (0/156); eight targeted interventions leave the failure in place, and positive controls locate it: a located rule is not induced, while given form and location the constants follow exactly. A version-space certificate proves identification is class-relative: at the widest dose the declared fit succeeds in 20/20 blocks and every sample-consistent circle is within tolerance in 18/20. We prove a class of entry rules exactly consistent with every sample yet harmless at play, so identifiability is a measurable property of the instrument. Re-scoring all 1034 artifacts on independent samples confirms acceptance certifies sample consistency and no more: where the gate is provably informative it covers about two percent of the exploited planner's queries.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.17956](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17956) \[cs.LG\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.17956v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17956v1) \[cs.LG\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17956](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17956) |

## Submission history

From: Javier Aguilar Martín \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/f786bca1/2608.17956)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 16:09:51 UTC (212 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.17956) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))