---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Preference Is Not Intervention: The Structure and Stability Boundaries of Reader-Specific Evidence Utility"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17781"
发布日期: "2026-08-18"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:45:17 UTC (420 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T14:42:49+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T14:38:42+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T06:42:49.294Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Oracle&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  []
相关厂家:
  - "Oracle"
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为RAG中读者特异性证据效用的稳定性，属于计算语言学，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施、供电散热互连或商业落地完全无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T14:45:55+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "研究检验RAG中读者特异性证据效用的稳定性：固定查询、证据与任务后，9个读者在33%的共同影响单元上对效应方向存在分歧；"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:22:35.679Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17781"
---

## Computer Science > Computation and Language

## Title:Preference Is Not Intervention: The Structure and Stability Boundaries of Reader-Specific Evidence Utility

Authors:[Shi Zhou](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zhou,+S)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.17781) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.17781v1)

> Abstract:ML systems increasingly condition decisions on downstream model identity, but this is useful only if model-specific differences form reusable structure rather than input-local interactions. We test this in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), where evidence utility can be measured under controlled interventions. Holding query, evidence, task, scoring, and intervention fixed, nine readers disagree on effect sign in 33\\% of jointly affected cells; reader $\times$ query interaction explains 29.8\\% of utility variance versus an 8.4\\% permutation null; and self-selected evidence improves F1 by $+0.031$ ($t=3.39$). We then ask the sharper question: \\emph{which components of this heterogeneity are stable reader properties across queries?} Separating three measurable objects---evidence \\emph{activity}, \\emph{ordinal preference}, and \\emph{conditional signed direction}---we find ordinal reader geometry stable across four independent settings (split-half $\rho=0.60$ --$0.83$): leave-one-out interventions, PRISM preferences, RAMDocs, and RAGuard. Signed geometry is task-bounded: weak in open-ended QA (0.14, 0.35), especially for misleading and irrelevant evidence, but strong in binary fact-checking (0.75) with no significant ordinal gap, though still below its sparsity-matched ceiling. Sparsity, decoding noise, and metric artifacts do not explain the main ordinal--signed gap. Finally, stable ordinal similarity fails to predict cross-reader intervention transfer (oracle-distance $\rho=-0.27$; regret reliability $-0.28$). Reader-specific utility exists, but preference is not intervention: stable ranking similarity does not license transfer of help/harm decisions.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| ACM classes: | H.3.3; I.2.7 |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.17781](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17781) \[cs.CL\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.17781v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17781v1) \[cs.CL\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17781](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17781) |

## Submission history

From: Shi Zhou \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/0231b27e/2608.17781)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:45:17 UTC (420 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.17781) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))