---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Physics of Agents: Statistical Mechanics Predicts Collective Behavior of AI Agents"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16578"
发布日期: "2026-08-17"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:41:24 UTC (11,293 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T14:57:12+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T14:53:31+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T06:57:12.987Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=SUE&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "SUE"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 10
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该arXiv论文研究AI智能体集体行为统计力学，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施及供电散热互连等主题完全无关，仅因搜索词命中SUE而出现。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T14:57:34+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 5
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "该研究分析了超过10,000个语言模型智能体社区反复交换信息、更新观点的过程，发现其集体动态可归纳为冷漠、极化和共识三种状态。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:24:21.765Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16578"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Physics of Agents: Statistical Mechanics Predicts Collective Behavior of AI Agents

Authors:[Batu El](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=El,+B), [Jinhee Paeng](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Paeng,+J), [Fatih Dinc](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Dinc,+F), [Shiye Su](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Su,+S), [Mete Erdogan](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Erdogan,+M), [Aneesh Pappu](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Pappu,+A), [Haotian Ye](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Ye,+H), [Wanjia Zhao](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zhao,+W), [Surya Ganguli](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Ganguli,+S), [James Zou](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zou,+J)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16578) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.16578v1)

> Abstract:AI agents increasingly operate as part of interacting systems rather than in isolation. As agents exchange information and jointly make decisions, their interactions can improve collective reasoning but may also produce herding, polarization, or amplify shared biases. Understanding and predicting these collective dynamics is therefore important for designing effective and aligned multi-agent systems. Here, we study over 10,000 communities of language-model agents that repeatedly exchange messages and revise their opinions across objective mathematics questions and subjective political statements. Despite substantial diversity in possible behavior, the individual and group dynamics can be represented by three characteristic regimes: indifference, polarization, and consensus. AI agents start indifferent and build conviction as they interact. On objective questions, communication improves collective accuracy, while on subjective questions it often drifts group opinions toward the right in the political spectrum. We explain these observations with a statistical-mechanics formalism in which agents stochastically favor lower social pressure. Given only initial opinions, our model predicts individual trajectories, outperforms all standard baselines, generalizes to unseen community graphs, and reproduces the observed group archetype distributions. Our fitted model parameters reveal the mechanics underlying our key observations: i) communities operate below the critical social temperature, which explains conviction buildup; ii) attractive ties outweigh repulsive ones, which favors consensus; and iii) agents holding the correct answer exert the strongest pull, which drives truth-seeking. Overall, our results demonstrate that collective behavior of AI agents, like that of other complex systems, follows compact and predictive dynamical laws.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.16578](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16578) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.16578v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16578v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16578](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16578) |

## Submission history

From: Batu El \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/f58bc945/2608.16578)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:41:24 UTC (11,293 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.16578) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))