---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Mitigating AI Risks in Computing Education via LLM-Driven Lecture Video Curation"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16131"
发布日期: "2026-08-17"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:scrape:strict_html_body"
发布时间证据: "citation_date: 2026/08/17"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 scrape:strict_html_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 6
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: ""
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-18T19:33:10+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-18T19:32:55+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-18T11:33:35.458Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=deployment&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "deployment"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为LLM驱动的教育视频检索，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，仅命中'deployment'一词不构成相关信号。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-18T19:34:04+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "该研究尝试用大语言模型从已录制的教学视频中检索片段来回答初学者编程问题，避免模型直接生成文本带来的幻觉与认知绕过风险。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:24:25.512Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月18日15点52分05秒"
采集批次ID: "20260818-155205-090"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16131"
---

## Computer Science > Computers and Society

## Title:Mitigating AI Risks in Computing Education via LLM-Driven Lecture Video Curation

Authors:[Owen Tang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Tang,+O), [Alexandra Vassar](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Vassar,+A), [Jake Renzella](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Renzella,+J)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16131) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.16131v1)

> Abstract:This study evaluates the effectiveness of utilising large language models (LLMs) to retrieve targeted segments from delivered video recordings to answer student questions in introductory programming environments. By restricting AI to identifying existing, educator-verified media rather than generating open-ended text, this approach aims to mitigate common pedagogical risks such as generative hallucinations and cognitive bypassing. We benchmarked three distinct models, two proprietary (Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT 5.4 Pro) and one open-weight (Qwen3.5 397B), against a human lecturer's manual video selections. An automated judging framework subsequently assessed the outputs for relevance, sufficiency, redundancy, and the presence of extraneous material. While the AI-retrieved timestamps rarely shared exact overlaps with the human baseline, the proprietary models achieved near-parity with the expert in delivering sufficient and highly relevant answers. Furthermore, a pilot deployment of this retrieval system in a large C programming cohort (n~=900) demonstrated strong user engagement, with students primarily utilising the tool to review foundational concepts. By leveraging AI to retrieve established lecture material, this approach shows potential for a reliable, high-fidelity pathway for safely integrating LLMs into novice computing courses.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.16131](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16131) \[cs.CY\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.16131v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16131v1) \[cs.CY\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16131](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16131) |

## Submission history

From: Jake Renzella Dr \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/e5e9df14/2608.16131)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:36:52 UTC (274 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.16131) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))