---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Towards Risk-free AI Agent Deployment"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16411"
发布日期: "2026-08-17"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:07:07 UTC (523 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T14:45:50+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T14:38:42+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T06:45:51.073Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Oracle&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "deployment"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  - "Oracle"
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 18
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该论文讨论AI Agent安全部署，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，仅搜索词或厂家命中，无有效相关信号。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T14:49:03+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 10
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 8
AI摘要: "该文主张基于智能体的“轨迹”（推理步骤、工具调用与环境观察）实现无风险部署，并将智能体测试与调试作为系统性研究方向来检测和缓解安全、合规与功能风险。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:24:37.480Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16411"
---

## Computer Science > Software Engineering

## Title:Towards Risk-free AI Agent Deployment

Authors:[Yintong Huo](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Huo,+Y), [Rangeet Pan](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Pan,+R), [Abhik Roychoudhury](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Roychoudhury,+A)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16411) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.16411v1)

> Abstract:LLM-based agents are rapidly moving from research prototypes into the core business processes of organizations, but these agents pose deployment risks to security, compliance, and functionality. In this article, we argue that risk-free deployment must be grounded in the agent's trajectory: the recorded sequence of reasoning steps, tool invocations, and environmental observations. Trajectories are available for any agent, and many failures are visible only in the trajectory. To make agents deployable and sustainable, we advocate agent testing and debugging as a systematic research direction for detecting and mitigating these risks. This article begins with the challenges of testing agents, including the oracle problem, non-determinism, trajectory validation, and the absence of adequacy metrics. We then turn to debugging agents, from automated failure attribution to repair and self-evolution. We distill these directions into a practical deployment-readiness checklist covering the full deployment lifecycle. Finally, we identify open problems, i.e., formal adequacy metrics, root-cause attribution over long-horizon trajectories, and the reliability of self-evolving agents, that the community must address to enable trustworthy agent deployment.

| Subjects: | Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.16411](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16411) \[cs.SE\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.16411v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16411v1) \[cs.SE\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16411](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16411) |

## Submission history

From: Yintong Huo \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/13e3eb7a/2608.16411)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:07:07 UTC (523 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.16411) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))