---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Think Inside the Chunk: RegulaRAG for Regulation-Compliant Scenario Generation using LLMs: A Case Study of UN Regulation No. 152"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16394"
发布日期: "2026-08-17"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:46:33 UTC (1,844 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T14:38:52+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T14:35:51+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T06:38:52.990Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Meta&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "performance"
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  - "Meta"
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为汽车法规合规场景生成的RAG系统，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施、供电散热互连等均无关联，属明显无关内容。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T14:39:36+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
AI摘要: "RegulaRAG是一种面向法规合规场景生成的检索增强生成（RAG）管道，通过SmartChunking与引用感知的图遍历增强段落和表格，再用Smart Retrieve & Rerank检索。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:25:14.201Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16394"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Think Inside the Chunk: RegulaRAG for Regulation-Compliant Scenario Generation using LLMs: A Case Study of UN Regulation No. 152

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16394) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.16394v1)

> Abstract:Generating regulation-compliant test scenarios is essential for validating safety-critical automotive systems, yet Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to ground outputs in long, hierarchical standards. We present RegulaRAG, a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline that couples SmartChunking, reference-aware enrichment of paragraphs and tables via graph traversal, with Smart Retrieve & Rerank over these enriched units. To test our system, we evaluate on a manually curated dataset covering all scenarios in UN Regulation No. 152 (AEBS). Our study comprises: (i) a three-step progressive search that identifies near-optimal retrieval parameters without exhaustive grid search; (ii) head-to-head comparisons against five baseline RAG systems; and (iii) a robustness stress test that scales the source corpus with distractor content. Outputs are evaluated using a customized penalized scoring metric. Across all experiments, RegulaRAG achieves the highest average Meta-Score (82.99), outperforming the next-best system by 43% (NoRAG: 57.94), while operating at 14k-25k tokens per query versus up to 500k for graphcentric baselines. It maintains strong performance, remaining stable even as the number of regulatory sources grows, whereas competing RAG systems degrade sharply in both quality and robustness.

| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.16394](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16394) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.16394v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16394v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16394](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16394) |

## Submission history

From: Vahid Zolfaghari \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/582a49cc/2608.16394)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:46:33 UTC (1,844 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.16394) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))