---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Le Critique: Privileged Value Functions for LLM Reinforcement Learning"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16739"
发布日期: "2026-08-17"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:49:36 UTC (658 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T15:47:30+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T15:43:02+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T07:47:30.876Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=throughput&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "throughput"
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 23
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为LLM强化学习算法，与超节点/AI Rack等硬件基础设施完全无关，无相关技术或商业信息。"
AI质检模型: "tx-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T15:53:19+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 15
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 8
AI摘要: "该研究提出两种互补策略以改进大语言模型强化学习的价值函数方法：特权价值函数（PVF）注入任务相关token级信号而不偏离策略目标，以及自适应基线TETHER，根据价值函数准确性在组相对基线与价值基线间插值。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:25:44.892Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16739"
---

## Computer Science > Machine Learning

## Title:Le Critique: Privileged Value Functions for LLM Reinforcement Learning

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16739) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.16739v1)

> Abstract:Reinforcement learning algorithms for Large Language Models (LLMs) are largely distinguished by their variance reduction strategy. Group-relative methods like GRPO reduce gradient variance by sampling multiple rollouts per prompt, but provide only sequence-level credit. Training is also blocked by straggler rollouts, reducing throughput and increasing off-policyness. Learned value functions theoretically address both problems, providing token-level advantages without requiring large groups. However, additional infrastructure engineering challenges combined with the practical success of critic-free methods have made it difficult to justify their inclusion in RL pipelines. We propose two complementary strategies to improve the performance of value function RL: 1) Privileged Value Functions (PVF) which provide an elegant mechanism to inject additional task-relevant token-level signal without biasing the policy objective; 2) TETHER, a baseline that adaptively interpolates between group-relative and value baselines depending on the value function accuracy. Across several reasoning tasks, both strategies consistently improve over the standard value function baseline, and are competitive with or outperform mean-baseline GRPO.

| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.16739](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16739) \[cs.LG\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.16739v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16739v1) \[cs.LG\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16739](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16739) |

## Submission history

From: Siddarth Venkatraman \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/141f3fcb/2608.16739)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:49:36 UTC (658 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.16739) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))