---
格式版本: 2
标题: "ORCA: Observability-Grounded Program Repair for Microservice Incidents"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17018"
发布日期: "2026-08-17"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:11:55 UTC (603 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-20T14:45:21+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-20T14:38:42+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-20T06:45:21.813Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Oracle&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "deployment"
相关厂家:
  - "Oracle"
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 8
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该资料为arXiv上一篇关于微服务故障修复的学术论文，主题与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，也未涉及供电、液冷、高速互连、量产落地等任何相关信号，属于明显无关内容。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-20T14:48:31+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 3
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 5
AI摘要: "ORCA 是一个面向微服务事故的、以可观测性为基础的自动程序修复流水线，通过对比故障与参考遥测生成故障签名，定位候选代码和配置位置并生成补丁候选。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:25:44.765Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月20日14点19分32秒"
采集批次ID: "20260820-141932-079"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17018"
---

## Computer Science > Software Engineering

## Title:ORCA: Observability-Grounded Program Repair for Microservice Incidents

Authors:[Yuanchen Gao](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Gao,+Y), [Yifang Tian](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Tian,+Y), [Yiran Li](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Li,+Y), [Charles Zhang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zhang,+C), [Hans-Arno Jacobsen](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Jacobsen,+H)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.17018) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.17018v1)

> Abstract:Microservice failures are often diagnosed from operational telemetry. However, automated program repair systems usually start from issue reports, localized code context, or failing tests. This mismatch leaves a gap between telemetry-based diagnosis and patch generation. We present ORCA, an observability-grounded APR pipeline for microservice incidents. ORCA first distills the differences in paired failure and reference telemetry into a fault signature, then uses the signature to identify candidate code and deployment-configuration locations. Repair graph agents and an Exploration agent generate unified-diff patch candidates from these locations. ORCA evaluates generated patches with a Telemetry-Grounded Patch Verifier that separates patch validity, syntactic and semantic correctness, test-oracle integrity, and telemetry replay. On a 575-case benchmark, ORCA outperforms all evaluated baselines in terms of cost-effectiveness. Results show that operational telemetry can be transformed from diagnostic evidence into actionable repair context: paired telemetry supports repair-oriented localization, while repair graph agents convert localized code and configuration evidence into constrained patch-generation context for the LLM. Telemetry-grounded verification then exposes repair outcomes that issue- or test-only evaluation would miss.

| Subjects: | Software Engineering (cs.SE) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.17018](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17018) \[cs.SE\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.17018v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17018v1) \[cs.SE\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17018](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17018) |

## Submission history

From: Yuanchen Gao \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/a973d3e9/2608.17018)\]  
**\[v1\]** Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:11:55 UTC (603 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.17018) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))