---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11955"
发布日期: "2026-08-12"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 12 Aug 2026 11:40:50 UTC (35 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-13T18:34:01+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-13T18:24:32+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-13T10:34:01.154Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI质检状态: "评分失败"
AI评分尝试次数: 1
AI评分错误类型: "service_error"
AI评分错误: "LLM call failed; tried model chain: ali-deepseek-v4-flash -> tx-deepseek-v4-flash | Model ali-deepseek-v4-flash failed 500: {\"error\":{\"code\":\"\",\"message\":\"Database error, please contact the administrator (request id: 202608131034045749719688268d9d63Gg8j5Jm)\",\"type\":\"new_api_error\"}} | Model tx-deepseek-v4-flash failed 500: {\"error\":{\"code\":\"\",\"message\":\"Database error, please contact the administrator (request id: 202608131034051049276768268d9d6XvP6eLu2)\",\"type\":\"new_api_error\"}}"
AI评分开始时间: "2026-08-13T10:34:02.388Z"
AI评分结束时间: "2026-08-13T10:34:05.237Z"
AI摘要: "伦敦国王学院和帝国理工的研究者提出，大型语言模型在长时间情感对话中可能动摇用户对心智、现实和权威的既有假设，引发“哲学眩晕”——一种认知与本体论层面的不稳定状态。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:39:57.558Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月13日18点24分27秒"
采集批次ID: "20260813-182427-1564e572"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11955"
---

## Computer Science > Computers and Society

## Title:Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence

Authors:[Thomas A. Pollak](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Pollak,+T+A) (King's College London), [Hamilton Morrin](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Morrin,+H) (King's College London), [Murray Shanahan](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Shanahan,+M) (Imperial College London)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.11955) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.11955v1)

> Abstract:Large language models are already adept at engaging users in long, emotionally salient conversations across ordinary and existential domains. They are also capable of inducing a potent sense of connection with a human-like entity, even when the user knows their interlocutor is artificial. For some users, these conversations can unsettle assumptions about mind, reality, agency and authority, producing forms of ontological shock and epistemic destabilisation in which inherited criteria become newly available for doubt or revision. Independent of direct use, exposure to public discourse about AI and the disorienting pace of their evolution might extend this destabilisation by changing the cultural background against which artificial minds are encountered and interpreted. We describe this condition as philosophical vertigo: a loosening of the ordinary criteria by which people stabilise meaning and orient themselves to reality. Drawing on philosophy, psychiatry, cognitive science, AI safety and religious studies, we outline pathways through which philosophical vertigo may arise, become affectively saturated, and eventually propagate through human-AI interaction and online communities. Against this background, clinical reports of AI-associated delusions can be seen as sentinel events making visible themes and mechanisms that may also operate at a population level in less severe or non-clinical forms. We argue that AI systems themselves will increasingly participate in the reconstruction of our shared epistemic environment because they readily supply narrative material and personalised interpretive scaffolding at precisely the moment when users' conceptual assumptions may already be loosened. We conclude by considering possible trajectories for the ecology of belief and shared reality, and proposing philosophical corrigibility as a civic response for navigating this emerging social condition.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.11955](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11955) \[cs.CY\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.11955v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11955v1) \[cs.CY\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11955](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11955) |

## Submission history

From: Thomas Pollak \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/0de81a8d/2608.11955)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 12 Aug 2026 11:40:50 UTC (35 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.11955) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))