---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Reconfiguring Geovisualization in the Age of Generative AI: Insights from Domain Experts"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12059"
发布日期: "2026-08-12"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:46:44 UTC (8,122 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-13T18:33:36+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-13T18:24:32+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-13T10:33:36.390Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI质检状态: "评分失败"
AI评分尝试次数: 1
AI评分错误类型: "service_error"
AI评分错误: "LLM call failed; tried model chain: ali-deepseek-v4-flash -> tx-deepseek-v4-flash | Model ali-deepseek-v4-flash failed 500: {\"error\":{\"code\":\"\",\"message\":\"Database error, please contact the administrator (request id: 202608131033394012948248268d9d6qmHgEMmi)\",\"type\":\"new_api_error\"}} | Model tx-deepseek-v4-flash failed 500: {\"error\":{\"code\":\"\",\"message\":\"Database error, please contact the administrator (request id: 202608131033406466487838268d9d6eltEPXE2)\",\"type\":\"new_api_error\"}}"
AI评分开始时间: "2026-08-13T10:33:36.395Z"
AI评分结束时间: "2026-08-13T10:33:40.761Z"
AI摘要: "该研究通过访谈20位地理可视化专家，探讨生成式AI对地理可视化的影响，发现其在数据处理、创意探索和快速原型上扩展能力，但瓶颈从生产转向判断与验证；专业价值更依赖空间推理与情境解释，并带来溯源、可解释性和责任分配等新挑战。"
AI摘要模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI摘要时间: "2026-09-07T03:40:27.521Z"
采集批次: "2026年8月13日18点24分27秒"
采集批次ID: "20260813-182427-1564e572"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12059"
---

## Computer Science > Computers and Society

## Title:Reconfiguring Geovisualization in the Age of Generative AI: Insights from Domain Experts

Authors:[Mengyi Wei](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Wei,+M), [Chenyu Zuo](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zuo,+C), [Jiaying Xue](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Xue,+J), [Nianhua Liu](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Liu,+N), [Dongsheng Chen](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Chen,+D), [Shengkai Wang](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Wang,+S), [Yu Feng](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Feng,+Y), [Liqiu Meng](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Meng,+L)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.12059)

> Abstract:GenAI is increasingly integrated into geovisualization, yet its broader implications for professional practice are insufficiently understood. To examine these implications, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 geovisualization experts. The interviews were structured around four broad analytical domains: Data, Ideation, Prototyping, and Iteration, while also encouraging participants to reflect on issues that extend beyond these activities. Our findings show that GenAI expands the capabilities of geovisualization, particularly in terms of data handling, creative exploration, and rapid prototyping, but does not simply remove existing constraints. Instead, key bottlenecks are shifting from production to judgment and verification. As routine technical tasks become more automated, professional value increasingly depends on spatial reasoning, contextual interpretation, aesthetic and ethical judgment, and the ability to assess whether AI-generated outputs are appropriate for use. At the same time, GenAI introduces new challenges regarding provenance, interpretability, and accountability, raising questions about how responsibility should be distributed across models, developers, practitioners, institutions, and users. These shifts are particularly significant in geovisualization because spatial representations are constrained by geographic reality and must balance scientific validity, visual expression, and technical implementation. We therefore argue that responsible GenAI in geovisualization requires domain-specific approaches to spatial validation, provenance, uncertainty communication, human oversight, and accountable use. This study provides an expert-grounded perspective on how GenAI is reconfiguring geovisualization as a practice of spatial knowledge production. It also identifies implications for future professional practice, education, system design, and governance.

| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.12059](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12059) \[cs.CY\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.12059v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12059v1) \[cs.CY\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.12059](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.12059) |

## Submission history

From: Mengyi Wei \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/afd2edc9/2608.12059)\]  
**\[v1\]** Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:46:44 UTC (8,122 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.12059) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))