---
格式版本: 2
标题: "The GenAI Catch-22: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Norwegian Newsrooms During the 2025 Parliamentary Election"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10773"
发布日期: "2026-08-11"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:27:12 UTC (3,135 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-12T11:29:35+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-12T11:26:18+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-12T03:29:35.672Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该资料为arXiv学术论文，主题是挪威新闻业中使用生成式AI的社会学研究，与超节点、AI Rack、机柜级AI系统、硬件架构、供电散热、互连等核心关注点完全无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-12T11:29:40+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
采集批次: "2026年8月12日2点04分20秒"
采集批次ID: "20260812-020420-289"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10773"
---

## Computer Science > Computers and Society

## Title:The GenAI Catch-22: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Norwegian Newsrooms During the 2025 Parliamentary Election

Authors:[Mari Reisjå](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Reisj%C3%A5,+M), [Anders Sundnes Løvlie](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=L%C3%B8vlie,+A+S)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.10773)

> Abstract:The increasing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in journalism raises concerns about possible detrimental effects both on journalism and its democratic function. We explore these risks through a case study of GenAI in Norwegian Newsrooms during the 2025 parliamentary election campaign. Based on interviews with managers and journalists over a ten-month period, we analyse how ambitious visions fared in the face of technological and practical challenges. We highlight the risk of an internal threat stemming from the journalists' own use of AI, contrasting the dominant focus on external disinformation threats. We show how newsroom managers shared sociotechnical imaginaries resulting in unrealistically optimistic beliefs about the capabilities of the technology and the pace of development, leading to plans for audience-facing GenAI services collapsing and giving way to more mundane uses of GenAI tools internally in the newsrooms. Furthermore, we identify a vulnerability in the newsroom's resilience against GenAI influence: a GenAI Catch-22. In order to monitor the GenAI tools and prevent errors and undue influence, newsrooms rely on human expertise. But by using GenAI extensively, the newsrooms risk a deterioration of human expertise, preventing them from monitoring the GenAI systems adequately.

| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.10773](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10773) \[cs.CY\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.10773v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10773v1) \[cs.CY\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10773](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10773) |

## Submission history

From: Anders Sundnes Løvlie \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/eccde99d/2608.10773)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:27:12 UTC (3,135 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.10773) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))