---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10909"
发布日期: "2026-08-11"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:30:29 UTC (5,248 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-12T11:26:51+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-12T11:25:10+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-12T03:26:51.916Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=model%20fit&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "model fit"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该资料为arXiv天文物理论文，讨论造父变星的脉动周期与半径，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，命中关键词'model fit'仅为搜索词命中，正文无任何相关技术或商业信息。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-12T11:27:01+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
采集批次: "2026年8月12日2点04分20秒"
采集批次ID: "20260812-020420-289"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10909"
---

## Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

## Title:Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems

Authors:[O. Ziółkowska](https://arxiv.org/search/astro-ph?searchtype=author&query=Zi%C3%B3%C5%82kowska,+O), [R. Smolec](https://arxiv.org/search/astro-ph?searchtype=author&query=Smolec,+R), [R. Singh Rathour](https://arxiv.org/search/astro-ph?searchtype=author&query=Rathour,+R+S), [V. Hocdé](https://arxiv.org/search/astro-ph?searchtype=author&query=Hocd%C3%A9,+V)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.10909) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.10909v1)

> Abstract:Context. With their precisely determined physical parameters, classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems are often used to constrain stellar evolution and pulsation theories. To this end, their position in the HR diagram, effective temperature and luminosity, and radius are commonly used when matching best-fitting evolutionary models. However, the pulsation period of Cepheids, the most precise observable, is rarely used in such studies. Aims. We explore how including the pulsation period as a constraint in matching evolutionary models affects the best-fitting solution. As the pulsation period follows the period-mean density relation, we examine whether it provides information consistent with that based on the stellar radius. Methods. We modeled four eclipsing binary systems with Cepheids from the LMC. We used $\chi^2$ minimization to find the best-matching evolutionary model from a grid of models computed with MESA. The evolutionary models are supplemented with pulsation periods computed with RSP, with nonlinear period corrections taken into account. Results. Depending on whether the radius or the pulsation period is used to select the best-fitting model, discrepant solutions are obtained. In solutions selected based on the pulsation period, the stellar radius is systematically too low compared with observations. Conversely, for solutions based on the radius, the pulsation period is systematically too long. The tension amounts to a few sigma for stars with precisely determined radii and part of it is traced to a nonlinear increase in radius for large-amplitude pulsators, which has not been studied in detail in the literature. Conclusions. When using Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems to constrain stellar models, we recommend using the pulsation period instead of the radius. A systematic study of nonlinear effects on stellar radius in large-amplitude pulsators is needed.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.10909](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10909) \[astro-ph.SR\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.10909v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10909v1) \[astro-ph.SR\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10909](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10909) |

## Submission history

From: Radoslaw Smolec \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/b05cd048/2608.10909)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:30:29 UTC (5,248 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.10909) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))