---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Probabilistic forecasting via post-processing prediction errors: In- or out-of-sample?"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10620"
发布日期: "2026-08-11"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:06:11 UTC (368 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-12T10:48:34+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-12T10:46:47+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-12T02:48:34.440Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Scale-up&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "Scale-up"
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "内容为统计概率预测论文，与超节点、AI Rack等主题完全无关，仅因搜索词“Scale-up”命中，但正文无任何相关技术或商业信息。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-12T10:48:40+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
采集批次: "2026年8月12日2点04分20秒"
采集批次ID: "20260812-020420-289"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10620"
---

## Statistics > Applications

## Title:Probabilistic forecasting via post-processing prediction errors: In- or out-of-sample?

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.10620) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.10620v1)

> Abstract:Many forecasting systems produce point forecasts even when decisions require information about uncertainty. We investigate whether post-processing methods can systematically improve upon traditional Gaussian predictive distributions constructed from in-sample residuals. We propose a hybrid framework that combines forecast error post-processing with model-specific scaling of forecast uncertainty across horizons. For a comprehensive evaluation, we apply historical simulation, conformal prediction, quantile regression, and GARCH-based post-processing to point forecasts generated by Theta, exponential smoothing, and ARIMA models. Using 14,407 monthly series from the M4 competition and forecast horizons of 1 to 12 months, we evaluate performance using the continuous ranked probability score and rank-based statistical comparisons. Averaged across horizons, all post-processing variants improve upon the benchmark predictive distributions, with gains of up to 4.6%. In-sample calibration outperforms its out-of-sample counterpart in 11 of the 12 model-method combinations, although the preferred post-processing method depends on the base model and forecast horizon. The advantage of in-sample calibration generally increases at longer horizons. Our results show that organisations can extend existing point-forecasting systems to provide useful uncertainty quantification without computationally intensive repeated model re-estimation.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Applications (stat.AP) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.10620](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10620) \[stat.AP\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.10620v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10620v1) \[stat.AP\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10620](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10620) |

## Submission history

From: Rafał Weron \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/411e75b9/2608.10620)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:06:11 UTC (368 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.10620) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))