---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Cross-Cutting Exposure as an Engine of Radicalization: Platform Design, Attention, and Geography in a Stochastic Multiplex Model of Opinion Dynamics"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10968"
发布日期: "2026-08-11"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:29:46 UTC (1,671 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-12T11:26:55+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-12T11:25:10+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-12T03:26:55.718Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=model%20fit&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "model fit"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 0
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "该资料为舆论动力学论文，内容与超节点/AI Rack等机柜级AI基础设施完全无关。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-12T11:27:06+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 0
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
采集批次: "2026年8月12日2点04分20秒"
采集批次ID: "20260812-020420-289"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10968"
---

## Physics > Physics and Society

## Title:Cross-Cutting Exposure as an Engine of Radicalization: Platform Design, Attention, and Geography in a Stochastic Multiplex Model of Opinion Dynamics

Authors:[Ruben E. Araújo](https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Ara%C3%BAjo,+R+E)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.10968) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.10968v1)

> Abstract:Do social-media platforms polarize because they hide disagreement, or because they expose people to it? We study a continuous-time model in which agents diffuse in physical space by Brownian motion while interacting through an adaptive, algorithmically curated digital network under a finite attention budget. When influence is purely assimilative (bounded confidence), opinion-blind long-range exposure heals locality-induced fragmentation and algorithmic homophily builds echo chambers. Once influence includes a repulsive response to strongly opposed views, the ranking of platform designs inverts: a neutral, uncurated platform drives maximal polarization with opinions pinned at the extremes; a controversy-seeking engagement algorithm is nearly as radicalizing; and strong algorithmic homophily paradoxically shields the population from extremism. A two-bloc reduction shows that the stationary cross-bloc attention fraction set by the engagement kernel controls the radicalization rate and a finite-horizon crossover $\lambda_c(T)$ in the digital attention share---consistent with simulations, with no parameters fitted to the onset data. Radicalization is thus rate-limited, not threshold-limited. Across repulsion parameters, kernels, and sizes up to $N=1600$, uncurated exposure sets the saturation level of radicalization. A mobility--attention phase diagram shows that once the platform owns most of an agent's attention, physical mobility becomes irrelevant. Under opinion-independent mobility we detect no geographic opinion structure; a Schelling-type homophilic drift of strength $\chi$ restores it only above a Péclet threshold $\chi\ell/D\sim 1$. The model offers a mechanism for field observations in which curated cross-cutting exposure increased polarization, and implies that exposure-diversity interventions can have either sign depending on the prevalence of negative influence.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.10968](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10968) \[physics.soc-ph\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.10968v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10968v1) \[physics.soc-ph\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10968](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10968) |

## Submission history

From: Ruben Araujo \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8fd84a61/2608.10968)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:29:46 UTC (1,671 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.10968) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))