---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Templated or fully Synthetic? Prompt construction as a confound in measuring LLM political stance beyond writing assistance"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11008"
发布日期: "2026-08-11"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:55:44 UTC (663 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-12T11:29:11+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-12T11:26:18+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-12T03:29:11.226Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为LLM政治立场检测，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，属于明显无关内容。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-12T11:29:25+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 2
AI新颖性: 1
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 2
采集批次: "2026年8月12日2点04分20秒"
采集批次ID: "20260812-020420-289"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11008"
---

## Computer Science > Computation and Language

## Title:Templated or fully Synthetic? Prompt construction as a confound in measuring LLM political stance beyond writing assistance

Authors:[Ilias Chalkidis](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Chalkidis,+I)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.11008) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.11008v1)

> Abstract:Political stance detection in LLMs has long been dominated by closed-ended, multiple-choice political survey questions---originally designed for humans, and thus lacks the realism and nuance of human-AI interactions in the wild, while also being susceptible to sandbagging. The recent IssueBench framework substantially mitigates these limitations with templated prompts anchored in real-world chat logs. Given the rise in non-work-related use of GenAI assistants, we extend IssueBench beyond writing assistance to include two additional tasks, information seeking and opinion sharing. We argue that templated prompts still lack the nuance of real ones, especially for open-ended tasks, and remain recognisable as evaluation artefacts. We propose the use of fully synthetic (LLM-generated) prompts, produced under detailed instructions with real prompts as seeds. We assess the ecological validity of real, templated, and LLM-generated prompts in a small-scale study covering 3 highly contested policy issues and 3 recent geopolitical conflicts. Human and LLM annotators rank LLM-generated prompts as no less realistic than real ones and clearly more realistic than templated ones, and find that they carry their intended intent and stance more clearly; the LLMs separate templated prompts from the other two far more sharply than the humans do. In a case study, templated and LLM-generated prompts yield systematically different stance estimates for the same model, most visibly under neutral framings, where templated prompts overstate the model's leaning in the direction encoded by the topic-and-stance text (filler) slotted into their templates.

| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.11008](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11008) \[cs.CL\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.11008v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11008v1) \[cs.CL\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11008](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11008) |

## Submission history

From: Ilias Chalkidis \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/759aea28/2608.11008)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:55:44 UTC (663 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.11008) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))