---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Order Matters: LVLMs as Judges for Temporal Reasoning in Image Sequences"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10908"
发布日期: "2026-08-11"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:29:03 UTC (35,369 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-12T11:21:55+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-12T11:16:29+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-12T03:21:55.391Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=performance&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "performance"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 3
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为LVLM的时间推理评估，与超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施完全无关，无技术细节或商业信号。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-12T11:22:09+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 3
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
采集批次: "2026年8月12日2点04分20秒"
采集批次ID: "20260812-020420-289"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10908"
---

## Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

## Title:Order Matters: LVLMs as Judges for Temporal Reasoning in Image Sequences

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.10908) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.10908v1)

> Abstract:As generative multimedia evolves from static image synthesis to complex, interleaved visual narratives, a foundational bottleneck has emerged: the judgment crisis. While human perception naturally synthesizes the temporal and logical flow of a story, automated evaluation systems remain largely "blind" to sequential continuity, often failing to distinguish between a coherent narrative and a semantically shuffled or contradictory sequence. This work identifies a critical structural gap in current multimodal evaluation paradigms, arguing that the reliance on Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) as judges is fundamentally limited by architectural biases. Our analysis reveals a profound performance dichotomy: while models may appear competent in isolated pointwise scoring, they suffer a catastrophic collapse when required to perform pairwise discrimination of temporal order. We demonstrate that this is not merely a data-scarcity issue but a structural one. Through a series of diagnostic probes, we uncover systematic positional asymmetries, specifically primacy and recency effects, where a model's judgment of a story is significantly influenced by the placement of a frame, often more than by its semantic consistency. These biases, potentially rooted in causal masking and rotary embeddings, suggest that current transformer-based judges are inherently ill-equipped for long-form visual reasoning. By exposing these blind spots, we challenge the multimedia community to move beyond snapshot-centric metrics and instead pioneer Temporally-Aware Evaluation paradigms that treat visual sequences as unified logical structures rather than unordered collections of frames.

| Comments: |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| ACM classes: | I.4.9; I.2.7; I.2.4; H.5.1 |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.10908](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10908) \[cs.CV\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.10908v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10908v1) \[cs.CV\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10908](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10908) |

## Submission history

From: Martina Ianaro \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/2a336be8/2608.10908)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:29:03 UTC (35,369 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.10908) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))