---
格式版本: 2
标题: "Long-Horizon AI Research for Grothendieck Constant: A Case Study in Human-AI Mathematical Collaboration"
原文链接: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11195"
发布日期: "2026-08-11"
发布时间校准状态: "found"
发布时间需复核: "否"
发布时间来源: "rule:local:strict_original_body"
发布时间证据: "**\\[v1\\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:53:48 UTC (966 KB)"
发布时间校准原因: "规则确认唯一严格发布时间，来源 local:strict_original_body"
发布时间校准置信度: "high"
发布时间候选数量: 18
发布时间严格候选数量: 6
发布时间原页读取状态: "source template page reused from URL open"
发布时间未找到原因: ""
发布时间校准时间: "2026-08-12T11:28:24+08:00"
发布时间仲裁状态: "skipped"
发布时间仲裁尝试次数: 0
发布时间仲裁耗时毫秒: 0
发现时间: "2026-08-12T11:26:18+08:00"
入库时间: "2026-08-12T03:28:24.740Z"
来源平台: "arXiv 学术论文搜索"
搜索渠道: "source_template"
搜索词: "https://arxiv.org/search/?query=AI&searchtype=all"
匹配关键词:
  - "AI"
相关厂家:
  []
相关专家:
  []
内容类型: "网页"
抓取工具: "Free Fetch + Defuddle"
清洗工具: "Defuddle Markdown + Defuddle/Readability 正文提取"
原始附件:
  []
AI优质: "否"
AI打分: 5
AI分档: "非优质"
AI质检状态: "不通过"
AI打分理由: "论文主题为AI辅助数学研究，完全无关超节点/AI Rack/机柜级AI基础设施，无任何相关技术或商业信号。"
AI质检模型: "ali-deepseek-v4-flash"
AI质检时间: "2026-08-12T11:28:38+08:00"
AI主题相关性: 0
AI来源权威性: 5
AI新颖性: 0
AI技术细节: 0
AI商业部署信号: 0
AI完整性: 0
采集批次: "2026年8月12日2点04分20秒"
采集批次ID: "20260812-020420-289"
去重键: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11195"
---

## Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

## Title:Long-Horizon AI Research for Grothendieck Constant: A Case Study in Human-AI Mathematical Collaboration

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.11195) [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.11195v1)

> Abstract:AI agents are increasingly used in mathematics research, but it is often unclear how to use them effectively. Towards this, we present an extensive case study of how AI was used to improve bounds on the Grothendieck constant $K_G$, which captures the hardness between combinatorial problems and their continuous relaxations. Specifically, while the precise value of $K_G$ is not known, we recently tightened the best known bounds to \\\[  
> \\frac{6\\pi}{11}  
> \\;\\le\\;  
> K\_G  
> \\;\\le\\;  
> \\frac{\\pi}{2\\log(1+\\sqrt2)} - 10^{-4}. \\\] Crucially, these improvements were achieved using an AI research system that could arrive at insights deemed novel by domain experts. We give a detailed discussion of our experience using AI for mathematics research, particularly touching upon its strengths and weaknesses, as well as our experience with creating ideal conditions for AI to arrive at breakthrough insights.

| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Functional Analysis (math.FA) |
| --- | --- |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2608.11195](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11195) \[cs.AI\] |
|  | (or [arXiv:2608.11195v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11195v1) \[cs.AI\] for this version) |
|  | [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11195](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11195) |

## Submission history

From: Rahul Saha \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/cc9a3934/2608.11195)\]  
**\[v1\]** Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:53:48 UTC (966 KB)

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2608.11195) | Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))
